14 Comments

What a beautiful place to photograph. You’ve got some wonderful results with that FED camera.

Expand full comment
author

oh yes, the place is really beautiful. thank you!

Expand full comment
Sep 26Liked by perfectlight

Since I only use a digital camera, I'm impressed with how you play and experiment with films and camera's. Thank you for sharing the results. Such differences.

Expand full comment
Sep 26Liked by perfectlight

The FED does have a better quality product, but that's not really surprising. There does seem to be a good amount of grain built into the NC-500, though.

Expand full comment
author

yes, the film is grainy for a 400 film but is not that bad when used in a better quality camera. i don't have any rolls left but i think that if i load it in the yashica, the results will be different again. i'm still surprised at the damage done by the flash on the double shot

Expand full comment
Sep 26Liked by perfectlight

Hey, this is great. I feel famous!

It's really interesting. The difference is dramatic. The FED looks so much better.

I'll have to ponder more about what could have caused all that grain. Thanks for including me in the results!

And I have to second Ms. Helmert. What a gorgeous location. The shot of the dappled light in the forest is really lovely. I want to go to there!

Expand full comment
author

if you want to go there it means i have accomplished my mission and did a good presentation of the place. thank you!

Expand full comment

I can't comment too much here but have been following your tests. I've only recently begun a deep dive into shooting, developing and printing film. I'm sticking with Ilford HP5 until I have a strong handle on the full process. Then I'll branch off into new film stocks. In the meantime. RE the grain being "unbearable," of course it's all a matter of taste, but there are many ways to use that to your advantage, no? As an element of tonality, giving your subject a certain aged or perhaps gothic look. Once you understand the limitations of film stock as you are, it seems to me that your tool box expands to your benefit.

Expand full comment
author

you are right in what you are saying, yes, i can play that film to my advantage but my question to myself (after this test) is: do i want to go there? i'm happy with the results from using the fed (especially the tones) so i know that the film is ok. i'm not happy with the results from the flash, even though was just a test. time will tell as i said: i will give it another go with a b&w film.

btw, i love hp5, very versatile, very reliable, consistent results.

Expand full comment

Oh my goodness, I somehow missed this. I will read through this post now. Ha!

Expand full comment
6 hrs agoLiked by perfectlight

The tones and the grain are beautiful!! I couldn’t agree more. When you used the flash, it is a bit much, even for me.

I think I am even a bigger fan of the tones now. They are so stunning! The very first set is my favorite.

Definitely have to try this film sometime.

Thanks for experimenting, comparing and staring!

Expand full comment
author

as long as you will not use a plastic camera with flash, you will get beautiful tones and grain. don't forget to show us the results.

Expand full comment
5 hrs agoLiked by perfectlight

Sure, I will if I will ever get back to taking photographs. :)

By the way, sharing not staring. I hate auto correct. WTH? 🤦🏻‍♀️

Expand full comment
author

you will, it's therapeutic and calming and exciting. just take your time.

Expand full comment